Legal Language of Scottish Burghs

$80.99

Taxes may apply at checkout.

Legal Language of Scottish Burghs

Standardization and Lexical Bundles (1380-1560)

Historical and comparative linguistics Legal history

Author: Joanna Kopaczyk

Dinosaur mascot

Collection: Oxford Studies in Language and Law

Language: English

Published by: Oxford University Press

Published on: 15th August 2013

Format: LCP-protected ePub

Size: 3 Mb

ISBN: 9780190243319


Overview

This book offers an innovative, corpus-driven approach to historical legal discourse. It is the first monograph to examine textual standardization patterns in legal and administrative texts on the basis of lexical bundles, drawing on a comprehensive corpus of medieval and early modern legal texts.

Focus and Context

The book's focus is on legal language in Scotland, where law—with its own nomenclature and its own repertoire of discourse features—was shaped and marked by the concomitant standardizing of the vernacular language, Scots, a sister language to the English of the day.

Methodology

Joanna Kopaczyk's study is based on a unique combination of two methodological frameworks: a rigorous corpus-driven data analysis and a pragmaphilological, context-sensitive qualitative interpretation of the findings.

Historical and Sociolinguistic Insights

Providing the reader with a rich socio-historical background of legal discourse in medieval and early modern Scottish burghs, Kopaczyk traces the links between orality, community, and law, which are reflected in discourse features and linguistic standardization of legal and administrative texts.

Key Topics

In this context, the book also revisits important ingredients of legal language, such as binomials or performatives. Kopaczyk's study is grounded in the functional approach to language and pays particular attention to referential, interpersonal, and textual functions of lexical bundles in the texts.

Contributions and Implications

It also establishes a connection between the structure and function of the recurrent patterns, and paves the way for the employment of new methodologies in historical discourse analysis.

Show moreShow less