Natural Resources, Extraction and Indigenous Rights in Latin America

£46.99

Natural Resources, Extraction and Indigenous Rights in Latin America

Exploring the Boundaries of Environmental and State-Corporate Crime in Bolivia, Peru, and Mexico

Regional / International studies Ethnic studies Sociology Anthropology Corporate crime / white-collar crime Human rights, civil rights Business and the environment; ‘green’ approaches to business Agribusiness and primary industries Energy industries and utilities Legal aspects of criminology Public international law: human rights Environment law Social and political philosophy Environmental policy and protocols Pollution and threats to the environment

Author: Marcela Torres Wong

Dinosaur mascot

Collection: Crimes of the Powerful

Language: English

Published by: Routledge

Published on: 3rd September 2018

Format: LCP-protected ePub

Size: 1 Mb

ISBN: 9781351210225


In 1989, the International Labor Organization stated that all indigenous peoples living in the postcolonial world were entitled to the right to prior consultation, over activities that could potentially impact their territories and traditional livelihoods. However, in many cases the economic importance of industries such as mining and oil condition the way that governments implement the right to prior consultation.

This book explores extractive conflicts between indigenous populations, the government and oil and mining companies in Latin America, namely Mexico, Peru and Bolivia. Building on two years of research and drawing on the state-corporate and environmental crime literatures, this book examines the legal, extralegal, illegal as well as political strategies used by the state and extractive companies to avoid undesired results produced by the legalization of the right to prior consultation. It examines the ways in which prior consultation is utilized by powerful indigenous actors to negotiate economic resources with the state and extractive companies, while also showing the ways in which weaker indigenous groups are incapable of engaging in prior consultations in a meaningful way and are therefore left at the mercy of negative ecological impacts. It demonstrates how social mobilization—not prior consultation—is the most effective strategy in preventing extraction from moving forward within ecologically fragile indigenous territories.

Show moreShow less